![]() ![]() Stability is my top priority so I'd prefer to use the FirePro driver if the FirePro driver is in fact getting installed.Ĭlick to expand.I did get the version of control center that was packaged with the FirePro driver to install (as opposed to installing it from the regular driver package separately) but I'm thinking it comes packaged with both versions and withheld the FirePro options from my install (I don't see anything specifically labeled with "FirePro" anywhere). I'm tying to decide on which driver I should use. ![]() Aside from Siemens, the results are all pretty close to an actual W9100.ĭoes anybody know of any physical differences between the 290x and W9100 (aside from the difference in memory)? I would imagine the W9100 cards are binned better but aside from that, I'm not really sure. ![]() if I got the FirePro drivers to install on my system then I know I'm running the FirePro driver, correct)? I'm curious as to the cause of the poor results in Siemens NX with both drivers (the W9100 gets around 4x the performance). I didn't have time to pay much attention to image quality but has anybody else noticed anything significant?ĪMD doesn't have the regular gaming drivers packaged in with the FirePro drivers do they (i.e. I know workstation drivers can improve image quality quite a bit as well. However, I don't think SPECviewperf tells the full story. I ran SPECviewperf on my 290x using both the regular drivers and the FirePro drivers.Īs far as FPS and SPECviewperf are concerned, the difference seems to be pretty insignificant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |